🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that could add several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to employ the districts created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican control. Usually, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another top Democratic leader stated the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.